A Norman conspiracy? – pt3

So, to quickly summarize pts 1 & 2, William the Conqueror (a Norman Duke) usurped the throne of the Aethelings, specifically Edgar, in 1066, and took the property from the Anglo-Saxon nobility of England and gave it to the Norman cousins and supporters who helped him win on the battlefield of Hastings.

The Aethelings were “elven,” descended ultimately from the ancient Royal Scythians (and probably had, like the Merovingians of later centuries, some Davidic blood in them, though I can’t back that up). This takeover, this throwing from the English throne of the Aetheling clan by William the Norman Duke, I believe, was alluded to allegorically by Charles Dogdson (aka Lewis Carroll) in his characters the Red and White Queens. Here is the clue in Alice in Wonderland, in which Dodgson points to the precise moment that the transfer of power occured, which convinces me that I’m on to something (quoting from the book):

“They were indeed a queer-looking party that assembled on the bank — the birds with draggled feathers, the animals with their fur clinging close to them, and all dripping wet, cross, and uncomfortable.

The first question of course was, how to get dry again: they had a consultation about this, and after a few minutes it seemed quite natural to Alice to find herself talking familiarly with them, as if she had known them all her life. Indeed, she had quite a long argument with the Lory, who at last turned sulky, and would only say, ‘I am older than you, and must know better’; and this Alice would not allow without knowing how old it was, and, as the Lory positively refused to tell its age, there was no more to be said.

At last the Mouse, who seemed to be a person of authority among them, called out, ‘Sit down, all of you, and listen to me! I’ll soon make you dry enough!’ They all sat down at once, in a large ring, with the Mouse in the middle. Alice kept her eyes anxiously fixed on it, for she felt sure she would catch a bad cold if she did not get dry very soon.

‘Ahem!’ said the Mouse with an important air, ‘are you all ready? This is the driest thing I know. Silence all round, if you please! “William the Conqueror, whose cause was favoured by the pope, was soon submitted to by the English, who wanted leaders, and had been of late much accustomed to usurpation and conquest. Edwin and Morcar, the earls of Mercia and Northumbria —”’

Ugh!’ said the Lory, with a shiver.

‘I beg your pardon!’ said the Mouse, frowning, but very politely: ‘Did you speak?’

‘Not I!’ said the Lory hastily.

‘I thought you did,’ said the Mouse. ‘— I proceed. “Edwin and Morcar, the earls of Mercia and Northumbria, declared for him: and even Stigand, the patriotic archbishop of Canterbury, found it advisable —”’

‘Found what?’ said the Duck.

‘Found it,’ the Mouse replied rather crossly: ‘of course you know what “it” means.’

‘I know what “it” means well enough, when I find a thing,’ said the Duck: ‘it’s generally a frog or a worm. The question is, what did the archbishop find?’

The Mouse did not notice this question, but hurriedly went on, ‘”— found it advisable to go with Edgar Atheling to meet William and offer him the crown. William’s conduct at first was moderate. But the insolence of his Normans —” How are you getting on now, my dear?’ it continued, turning to Alice as it spoke.

‘As wet as ever,’ said Alice in a melancholy tone: ‘it doesn’t seem to dry me at all.’

‘In that case,’ said the Dodo solemnly, rising to its feet, ‘I move that the meeting adjourn, for the immediate adoption of more energetic remedies —’...”

What are the chances that Dodgson would chose this moment in history as the topic of the mouse’s “dry” speech, if he weren’t trying to tell us something?  Pretty conclusive, I would think.

Why did Dodgson associate the “elves” with the White Queen? – Words elf, alf, alb, albi and alp (different words for the “elven” race in different tongues) all derive from the Latin ‘alpus,’ meaning white. (The elves were very fair-complected.  The name of Edgar’s ancestor, Alfred the Great, really should be read as Aelf-red, the Great, i.e. the ‘Great Red Elf’).

Why should William the Conqueror, his Normans, and their Viking ancestors be associated with the Red Queen? ‘Cause they were a bloody lot and consolidated their power by killing anyone who stood in their way (and not just in England – previously they had conquered southern Italy, Sicily and, in the 8th century, their home in Normandy which had also been wrested from the French by invasion and violence).

Why is any of this important, why am I going to this trouble to write about William the Conqueror? Sure, it’s interesting that Charles Dodgson alluded to this takeover of the English crown in his Alice in Wonderland books. But why was he moved to make reference to this event in two of his characters?

In part 2 I discussed the ‘Cutting of the Elm,’ which I think lends credence to the theory that the Templars had become a largely Norman affair, failed their patriarchs (the Priory of Sion & the Davidic bloodline of Lorraine) and were thrown out of France.  They (or, I should say, their descendants and heirs of the Order) reemerged on the stage of history when the British and Dutch East India Companies were established at the beginning of the 17th century and, not long after, Freemasonry came out of the closet.  (The British and Dutch East India Company investors, governors, ship captains, etc., were stock full of Freemasons and lodges sprang up all along the trade routes.  Links between the Templars and Freemasonry have long been suspected, and many books have been written on the subject, Born of Blood by John J. Robinson being one.)

Getting back to my point, I’ll tell you why this is all important.  When America declared independence, a group of rich families in Massachusetts launched a campaign to STOP the founders from severing ties with England, and right up to this day have been waging a covert war against the ideas of Liberty and individual sovereignty, in support of the old caste system which honored the ideas of monarchy and aristocracy.

A name was attached to these families, the ‘Essex Junto,’ for the county of Essex where most of them lived.  Aaron Burr, the killer of Alexander Hamilton (and Thomas Jefferson’s VP!) was one of them.  (Tells you how much political pull these people had, and how close they came to snuffing out the American nation in its infancy!)  But the core families were those of Cabot, Lowell, Perkins, Higgenson & Russell.  These families intermarried (over time) with and/or were in business with other pro-Anglican families in New England, those of Peabody, Low, Astor, Roosevelt, Root, Lodge, Astor and a few others.  Many of these families made huge fortunes trading in slaves and/or opium. 

They parlayed those fortunes into the establishment of the ‘Ivy League Schools.’  (That’s why what I’m explaining is not common-knowledge – they suppressed all of this history at the top level of American education, at Harvard, Yale, Columbia and Princeton U.)

The slave and opium trades were the domain of the British and Dutch East India Companies.  Why did these companies, particularly the BEIC, allow these American families to engage in trade in China (and, in the case of the DEIC, the West Indies), allowing them to become filthy rich?  The British and Dutch East India Companies maintained monopolies, very lucrative monopolies, which they protected with the force of their guns.  But they allowed the Essex Junto families (and their cousins and business partners) access to these markets, because they (the pro-Anglo anti-independence Americans) were in the best position to first prevent, then stop, and later reverse, if they could, what we know as the American Revolution.

OK, the British East India Company (and its Dutch competitor as well) were essentially Norman institutions.  If you were an aristocrat in England and had money to invest in the BEIC in 1600, you were probably of Norman ancestry, and if you had a lot of money, of exalted ancestry at that.   You were also a monarchist and a feudalist (and a racist) who believed in colonizing the world (and, so far, had gotten rich doing it).  The ideas forwarded by the American founders would been anathema to you.  

Have you figured out that the families of New England who worked behind the scenes to sabotage the American effort to split from Britain and establish a new nation, founded on new ideas of personal liberty and sovereignty, were royalists working hand in hand with their English cousins and business partners?

They were, and the families I mentioned earlier, those of the Essex Junto and those who they intermarried with and partnered in business with, Cabot, Lowell, Perkins, Russell, Peabody, Low, Astor, Roosevelt, Root, Lodge … are all families of NORMAN ANCESTRY.  In fact, if you look them up at houseofnames.com, it states that each of these families descend from a Norman ancestor who actually fought on the battlefield of Hastings with William the Conqueror in 1066, winning lands and title in England.

(Note to those out there whining about a “Jewish” conspiracy, yeah, I know, the Rothschilds and Warburgs are in on all this, but stuff some of that Norman tobacco in your pipe and smoke it.)

Leave a Reply