Wednesday: Trump meets with Kissinger
Don’t know if you knew, but Henry Kissinger is in the inner circle. He’s one of the uber-elite bad guys that is FREAKING OUT that self-funded Donald Trump might actually become president.
I wonder. Who set this meeting up, who initiated this? Was it Donald, attempting to strike some deal, or peace, with the invisible elite? Or the elite cabal, coming to the realization that they can’t stop this guy, that their best strategy is to talk to him, and to try to come to some kind of consensus?
I’d love to be a fly on the wall of this meeting. I’d imagine it will be a tap-dance that would get three 10’s on Dancing With the Stars. Fundamentally, Donald’s goal is to restore America to it’s former glory (that is, rescue it from its decline and raise it to new heights. Whether or not he can do it or not, remains to be seen, but that’s his motto, and I don’t doubt that that is his intention). Kissinger (David Rockefeller’s pal), on the other hand, is a member of an elite cabal whose goal is, and has been for a century (two, actually), to destroy America, that is, suppress the engine of American prosperity and independence, and prepare the country for folding into their wet-dream of open borders and one-world-government. (You can catch them, from time to time, referring to this vision of theirs as a “New World Order.”)
Trump is a true wild card in all this (he’s self-funded, actually wants to save America, not destroy it). The elite bastard men-behind-the-curtain did not expect someone like this guy to come along. Who instigated this meeting between Trump and Kissinger, and what will come out of it?
Folks, we are watching history, unprecedented events, unfold, right before our eyes — more than you think.
Trump supporters hate HIllary with a passion. They also think that Trump will magically fix the country and bring in a golden age. As each day goes by their hope grows higher and higher. At the same time you have a crowd who hates Trump so much they will vote for hillary just to not have Trump.IF it ends up with Trump vs hillary and HIllary wins theres going to be civil unrest( the clashes you see now is a teaser trailer) and that will fulfill their goal of the destruction of he US. SO Trump is a useful tool
“Kissinger (David Rockefeller’s pal), on the other hand, is a member of an elite cabal whose goal is, and has been for a century (two, actually), to destroy America, that is, suppress the engine of American prosperity and independence, and prepare the country for folding into their wet-dream of open borders and one-world-government. ”
LOL these people are the ones who build up America, they are the ones who brought” prosperity and independence”, but for a reason of course. the US played its part the same way Britain played its part. They are going to move on. Try to guess where
Interesting perspective, and I think you you are correct, but with caviats (I believe). First of all, the elite are not happy about any of this, they are scared to death of Trump, and are pushing and pulling their levers as fast as they can to try and stop him. He would, if elected, undo 30 years of their work and effort. As to your other points, the better the understanding of the bigger picture, the better the analysis of specific people, or events, or even trends. The book that really upped my understanding of the bigger picture was 'Treason in America' by Anton Chaitkin. I highly recommend it (if you can find it).
The Rockefeller story is quite interesting. Basically, as I see it, he (John D.) was capitalized by the elite who were trying to change the country (primarily by Jacob Schiff (Khun and Loeb) and the Cleveland and New York National City Banks), and they recruited him to their cause. All of these robber barons were wildly successful, thanks to the free-capitalist American model, exploited it, then teamed up to destroy it, to (a) prevent competitors from repeating their own success, and (b) allow them to run the whole country and turn it into a top-down socialist-type thing, rather than a bottom-up Republic type of thing. Those robber baron families I speak of, Rockefeller, Harriman, Morgan, along with European allies Rothschild and Warburg (and a couple others — forgot the names) were the original owners of Federal Reserve regional bank stock. By the rules of the Fed by-laws, these stockholders are not allowed to trade or sell their stock. Only to transfer to heirs. So, the same families, or extended families (no one knows who, exactly. The current owners of the stock is a closely guarded secret), still own the Federal Reserve. (Oh, if you didn't know, it's not a government institution; it's a privately owned corporation with a contract with the government to provide currency.)
I beleive Trump is no different than the other robber barons who were given wealth but were still tools of the bigger players. If he truely were independent he would get the Ron Paul treatment.
” the better the understanding of the bigger picture, the better the analysis of specific people, or events, or even trends”
Completely agree with you, but you have to look beyond America, specially the robber baron take over. The founding fathers werent the good guys the way most people think, 50 of the 56 who signed the declaration of independence were masons. Washington and Jefferson were both supporters of weishaupt. One was a mason while the other wanted compulsory state education for every child. And the plan of the city of Washington DC was designed by a mason in the form of a pentagram. What America did was create the first ever secular nation where “Liberty” and “Inalienable rights” replaced Christian morals and rules. This concept was discussed in the secret meetings of the original Illuminati. The idea of the state protecting you eventually ended up providing for you and you have the modern day America, where the state is the almighty.
“All of these robber barons were wildly successful, thanks to the free-capitalist American model”
Not really. It was the Coinage Act of 1873 which contracted the money supply and sent the nation into a depression that allowed the european bankers to use all their gold to buy up America by financing their local agents. That Act was not very Free market Capitalist if you think about it. i cant remember the exact details as to how it came about but it would be worth looking into.
Very astute, Oz. However, there was a rift within freemasonry. 'Free and Accepted' freemasons, which founders like Washington and Franklin subscribed to, and the "old order," which eventually evolved into the Scottish Rite, who were royalists to the core and hated the idea of a free people ruled by a limited and representative government, were rivals.